Perfect James Bond Theory Explains Why He’s Such A Bad Spy

Perfect James Bond Theory Explains Why He's Such A Bad Spy

A theory about James Bond suggests that he’s actually a bad spy on purpose, and it explains a lot about the character and his cinematic history. James Bond is one of the most iconic characters in all of cinema. First introduced to moviegoers in 1962’s Dr. No, Bond’s cinematic legacy extends all the way to the present day, with a current total of 27 films centered on the character. However, despite his longevity, Bond’s credentials as an actual agent have often been called into question.

In many ways, James Bond has become the quintessential movie spy. Through his many incarnations, the qualities that are attributed most to James Bond are that he’s suave, confident, and deadly. However, with six different actors delivering different versions of Bond over the character’s cinematic history, he’s been many other things, too. Pierce Brosnan’s James Bond was a tragic figure, whereas Sean Connery’s was often arrogant. Daniel Craig’s Bond was particularly stoic, and Roger Moore’s was sillier. However, one thing that all Bonds have in common is that they aren’t technically good spies.

SCREENRANT VIDEO OF THE DAY

Related: Why Bond Actors Third Movies Are Usually The Best

James Bond is widely credited with creating a number of misconceptions about real-life spies and the work they do. Bond’s high-octane actions and thrilling vehicular chases make for excellent cinema, but they aren’t entirely indicative of the real work that actual spies carry out. One fan theory, posted to Reddit, explains that Bond being bad at his job is actually by design. According to the theory, Bond’s real job is to act as a distraction for more competent spies, and it’s surprisingly convincing upon inspection of the wealth of evidence that the James Bond franchise offers.

What Makes James Bond A Terrible Spy

James-Bond-Daniel-Craig-Codename

This entire James Bond theory is hinged upon the idea that Bond is a bad spy. However, as the character has become so thoroughly synonymous with the profession, this might not be immediately apparent, as the James Bond movies have popularized an image of spy work that isn’t at all accurate. Many of the qualities most associated with Bond are not at all conducive to a good spy. For a start, he’s almost never inconspicuous – Bond is regularly seen pulling up to the villain’s hideout in an expensive car with a tailored suit, drawing the attention of everyone around him. What’s more, his catchphrase is literally just him making sure everyone knows his name.

As James Bond starts most movies by capturing people’s attention and then introducing himself, he actively forgoes any sense of anonymity or stealth. More than this, Bond also actively pursues romantic and emotional entanglements while working, something that only ever distracts from his missions (which are usually to save the world, in one form or another). Bond’s inability to focus on the task at hand or solve issues quietly and without unnecessary violence prove that he’s simply not a very good spy.

The Real MI6 Have Said Bond Wouldn’t Qualify As A Spy

James Bond speaking to an MI6 clerk in No Time To Die

Though it’s clear to many that James Bond simply isn’t a good spy, there is actually real-world evidence to indirectly back up the theory. Not only does fictional super-spy James Bond do a pretty poor job in-universe for the MI6, but the actual director of the real-life organization has said that he wouldn’t hire Bond as a spy. Alex Younger, the former Chief of the Secret Intelligence Service (also known as MI6) spoke about Bond in 2016, calling the character “a blessing and a curse” for the intelligence organization.

Related: Why Roger Moore’s Older James Bond Wouldn’t Work in 2022

According to Younger, Bond’s regular breaking of the law, and his reckless and immoral behavior would actually likely disqualify him from a role with MI6. Younger specifically said that “were Bond to apply to join MI6 now, he would have to change his ways.” Younger also explained that Bond has perpetuated the stereotype of Oxbridge-educated highly trained combatants being the only efficient officers for MI6, something which he labels “patently untrue”.

Bond’s Real Purpose Is To Distract Villains

Silva speaking with James Bond in his lair in Skyfall

The idea that James Bond’s 007 is not a good spy – and would likely not technically qualify for the real-life role at MI6 – seems to further evidence the theory that his true purpose is actually not what it seems. According to the theory, James Bond’s real job is essentially that of a “doomed spy”, an agent implanted into an enemy organization with the express purpose of allowing the real spies to seem more credible. This is certainly a role that Bond would convincingly fill: he has described himself as “the world’s most famous spy”, which should indicate just how ridiculously bad an agent he truly is.

As James Bond’s villains are so preoccupied with contending with the obvious and often clumsy machinations of Bond, this actually creates better opportunities for more subtle spies to infiltrate their criminal organizations. If James Bond was indeed working alone to topple high-profile criminals and terrorists, it wouldn’t follow that he’d so blatantly involve himself in the affairs of his villains. The theory essentially paints Bond’s bad spy work in a far more sympathetic light, explaining that his terrible attempts at duplicity and subtlety were actually intended to distract the villains from the real spies working behind the scenes, and it actually makes far more sense than taking James Bond movies at face value.

The Theory Clears Up James Bond Plot Holes

Casino royale 2006 most popular james bond movie

As with many high-concept action movies, James Bond movies are often riddled with plot holes. For example, in Casino Royale, Bond is responsible for a PR nightmare in Madagascar, which results in newspaper reports of an MI6 operative being at fault. Bond isn’t shown to alert anyone to his allegiance to MI6, making the moment appear to be a significant plot hole to start Daniel Craig’s tenure as Bond. However, if the theory is to be taken as true, the supposed plot hole actually becomes evidence, as it would fit with the idea of using Bond’s bad spy work as a cover for more competent agents to work undetected.

Related: Why So Many Bond Girls Betray 007

There is a great deal of James Bond plot holes, but many of the most glaring can easily be explained by the theory. If the titular spy is in fact deliberately acting against standard MI6 procedure in order to allow others to better gather intelligence, it paints the overall plot of most of his movies very differently. Though deliberately attracting attention through Bond’s various well-established methods certainly seems to be the behavior of a particularly terrible spy, this theory actually provides additional context that makes MI6’s James Bond appear to be a far better agent than he would otherwise.

Next: Daniel Craig’s James Bond Era Was The Bleakest (Which Is A Good Thing)

David Toborowsky Annie Suwan In 90 Day Fiance

90 Day Fiancé: David Flaunts Weight Loss Progress By Dancing For Annie

About The Author

Niall Gray
(327 Articles Published)

Niall Gray is a features writer for Screen Rant covering just about every film- or TV-related topic he’s loosed upon. When he’s not busy putting words together in various places for various reasons, Niall can usually be found filling his brain with an endless stream of pop culture trivia, teaching children to box, or simply hiding with his nose in a book.

More From Niall Gray

Author: Deann Hawkins